IELTS Writing · 19

The bar chart compares how much money was spent on art education per student in four kinds of schools in a single region in 2010 and 2023. Overall, spending on art education fell in public schools over this period, whereas it rose markedly in private schools. As a result, the gap between public and private provision widened considerably by 2023. In 2010, public schools devoted modest amounts to the arts, with primary public schools spending $85 per student and secondary public schools spending $110. By 2023, both figures had declined, dropping to $60 and $75 respectively. This represents a fall of around 30 per cent in each case. Private schools, by contrast, invested far more from the outset. Primary private schools spent $220 per student in 2010, rising to $290 in 2023, while secondary private schools increased their spending most sharply, from $260 to $340. Thus, secondary private schools remained the highest spenders throughout the period.

There is an ongoing debate about whether schools should cut funding for the arts in order to invest more heavily in academic disciplines such as science and mathematics. While I recognise the importance of strong academic teaching, I disagree with the view that art subjects should be sacrificed to achieve it. Those who support reducing art funding argue that science and mathematics offer clearer economic returns. In an increasingly technological world, employers demand graduates with strong analytical and digital skills, and these competencies are rooted in academic subjects. From this perspective, every dollar spent on painting or drama could be seen as money diverted from preparing students for the modern workforce. However, this argument overlooks the broader purpose of education. Art subjects develop creativity, emotional intelligence and self-expression, qualities that are valuable in almost every career, including scientific ones. Many innovations come from people who can think imaginatively, not merely follow procedures. Furthermore, music and drama improve confidence, teamwork and communication, helping students who may struggle academically to find a sense of achievement and belonging at school. Reducing art funding could also widen inequality. Wealthy families can pay for private music lessons or theatre classes, but poorer children often rely entirely on what their school provides. Removing these opportunities would deny disadvantaged students access to cultural experiences that enrich their lives. In conclusion, although academic subjects deserve adequate resources, this should not come at the expense of the arts. A balanced curriculum that nurtures both intellectual and creative abilities produces more rounded, capable and fulfilled individuals.